MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4247847255 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-53396/v2

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are early indicators of an upcoming metabolic decline in Alzheimer’s disease

2020· preprint· en· W4247847255 on OpenAlexaff
Kok Pin Ng, Tharick A. Pascoal, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Yiong Huak Chan, Lai Jiang, Joseph Therriault, Andréa L. Benedet, Monica Shin, Nagaendran Kandiah, Celia M.T. Greenwood, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Serge Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilFleniDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative ErkrankungenKorea Health Industry Development InstituteJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsDiadMutationPenetranceDiseaseConfoundingMedicineInternal medicineGeneticsOncologyPsychologyBiologyChemistryPhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are increasingly recognized as early non-cognitive manifestations in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum. However, the role of NPS as an early marker of pathophysiological progression in AD remains unclear. Dominantly inherited AD (DIAD) mutation carriers are young individuals who are destined to develop AD in future due to the full penetrance of the genetic mutation. Hence, the study of DIAD mutation carriers enables the evaluation of the associations between pure AD pathophysiology and metabolic correlates of NPS without the confounding effects of co-existing pathologies. In this longitudinal study, we aim to identify regional brain metabolic dysfunctions associated with NPS in cognitively intact DIAD mutation carriers. Methods We stratified 221 cognitively intact participants from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer’s Network according to their mutation carrier status. Regression mixed effect models with family-level random effects evaluated the interactions of NPS measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q), age and estimated years of onset (EYO) as a function of metabolism measured by [ 18 F]flurodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) positron emission tomography in DIAD mutation and non-mutation carriers. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify the neuropsychiatric subsyndromes in DIAD mutation carriers using the NPI-Q sub-components. Regression mixed effect models then evaluated the interactions of specific neuropsychiatric subsyndromes with EYO on metabolism.Results 119 mutation and 102 non-mutation carriers were studied. The interaction of higher NPI-Q and shorter EYO was associated with more rapid global and regional [ 18 F]FDG uptake decline in the posterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, bilateral parietal lobes and right insula in DIAD mutation carriers. The neuropsychiatric subsyndrome of agitation, disinhibition, irritability and depression interacted with EYO to drive [ 18 F]FDG uptake decline in the DIAD mutation carriers. The interaction of NPI and EYO was not associated with [ 18 F]FDG uptake in DIAD non-mutation carriers. Conclusions NPS in cognitively intact DIAD mutation carriers may be clinical indicators of subsequent metabolic decline in brain networks vulnerable to AD, which support the emerging conceptual framework that NPS represent early manifestations of neuronal injury in AD. Further studies using different methodological approaches to identify NPS in preclinical AD are needed to validate our findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→