MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247923578 · doi:10.1177/2043820612443783

On the waterfront

2012· article· en· W4247923578 on OpenAlexaff
Jamie Peck

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues in Human Geography · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaphorPeck (Imperial)Relation (database)Economic geographySociologyEpistemologyEconomicsComputer scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By way of a response to commentaries on the paper, ‘Economic geography: Island life’ (Peck, 2012), three themes are briefly considered – concerning metaphor, markets, and method. Attention to ‘missing’ markets should not be seen as an invitation to market-centricity, but instead to explorations of ‘real’ and heterogeneous markets in a range of instituted contexts, positioned relationally among their others (that is, in relation both to other markets and other non-market forms of economic organization). This will call for creative methodological strategies, including a more explicit embrace of comparative approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.013
Scholarly communication0.0090.018
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialogues in Human GeographySame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207