Bibliographic record
Abstract
Books reviewed Covenant and Eschatology: The Divine Drama by Michael S. Horton (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2002), + 351 pp. reviewed by Ben Quash Peterhouse University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 1RD UK Feminist Theology: Voices from the Past by Ann Loades (Cambridge: Polity, 2001), vi + 216 pp. reviewed by Susan Abraham Department of Theology St. Bonaventure University St. Bonaventure, NY 14778 USA Divine Action & Modern Science by Nicholas Saunders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), xviii + 234 pp. reviewed by Larry Chapp DeSales University 2755 Station Avenue Center Valley, PA 18036 USA Abraham! Abraham! Kierkegaard and the Hasidim on the Binding of Isaac, by Jerome I. Gellman (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003), + 125 pp. reviewed by Claire Elise Katz Department of Philosophy The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 USA The Priority of Love: Christian Charity and Social Justice by Timothy P. Jackson (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003), xix + 229 pp. reviewed by Joel James Shuman Department of Theology King's College 133 North River Street Wilkes‐Barre, PA 18711 USA Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism by Alain Badiou, translated by Ray Brassier (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), x + 111 pp. reviewed by Douglas Harink The King's University College 9125—50th Street Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2H3 Canada After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism by Fergus Kerr (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002), viii + 254. reviewed by D. Stephen Long Garrett Evangelical Theological Seminary 2121 Sheridan Road Evanston, IL 60201 USA Heidegger's Atheism: The Refusal of a Theological Voice by Laurence Paul Hemming (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002), x1 + 327 pp. reviewed by Cyril O’Regan Department of Theology University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA Aquinas on Being by Anthony Kenny (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002), x + 212 pp. reviewed by Herwi Rikhof Katholieke Theologische Universiteit te Utrecht/Thomas Instituut Utrecht Postbus 80101 3508 TC Utrecht THE NETHERLANDS Jesus the Pharisee by Hyam Maccoby (London: SCM Press, 2003), x + 228 pp. reviewed by Kristen H. Lindbeck 469 East Olmos Drive San Antonio, TX 78212 USA
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.685 | 0.664 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".