Accréditation syndicale — Requête en révocation d'accréditation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Commission de Relations ouvrières décide qu'une requête en révocation d'accréditation (reconnaissance) syndicale logée par l'employeur, celui-ci invoquant le fait que le syndicat accrédité ne détient plus la majorité des salariés à son emploi, ne saurait être reçue, lorsque la non-utilisation du certificat est due aux procédures successives intentées par l'employeur à l'encontre de son émission, procédures qui ont été reconnues mal fondées. La Commission ne peut accueillir une pareille requête, parce qu'elle la considère prématurée à ce stage, le certificat d'accréditation n'ayant pas encore épuisé ses effets. Elle refuse, de plus, l'audition sur le refus de révocation. Richstone Bakeries, Inc., requérante, vs Food Drivers, Commission Salesmen, Dairy and Ice Cream Workers, Local Union no 973; Commission de Relations ouvrières de Québec, Montréal, le 25 novembre 1963; Bulletin d'information du Ministère du Travail de Québec avril 1964, pp. 114-120; M. le Juge A B. Gold, vice-président; Mr K.G. Baker, c.r., (dissident) et André Roy, commissaires, Me George I. Harris, c.r., pour la requérante; Me André Antonuk, pour l'intimée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".