MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247943133 · doi:10.1002/ebch.123

Cochrane review: Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants

2007· article· en· W4247943133 on OpenAlexaff
Arne Ohlsson, SM Aher

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLow birth weightHematocritCochrane LibraryAnemiaPediatricsBirth weightErythropoietinRandomized controlled trialPlaceboBlood transfusionPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Hematocrit falls after birth in preterm infants due to physiological factors and blood letting. Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anemia. Objectives Primary objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of early initiation of EPO (initiated before eight days after birth) in reducing red blood cell transfusions in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Secondary objectives: Subgroup analyses of low (< 500 IU/kg/week) and high (> 500 IU/kg/week) doses of EPO and, within these subgroups, analyses of the use of low (< 5 mg/kg/day) and high (> 5 mg/kg/day) doses of supplemental iron, in reducing red blood cell transfusions in these infants. Search strategy The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, abstracts from scientific meetings published in Pediatric Research and reference lists of identified trials and reviews were searched in November 2005. No language restrictions were applied. Selection criteria Randomised or quasi‐randomized controlled trials of early initiation of EPO treatment (started before 8 days of age) vs. placebo or no intervention in preterm (< 37 weeks) and/or low birth weight (< 2500 g) neonates. For inclusion, the studies needed to provide information on at least one outcome of interest. Data collection and analysis Data were abstracted by the two authors on pre‐tested data collection forms. Data were entered by one review author (AO) and checked for accuracy by the other (SA). Data were analysed using RevMan 4.2.8. The statistical methods included ‘typical’ relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) and needed to treat to harm (NNTH) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes reported with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effects model was used for meta‐analyses. Heterogeneity tests, including the I‐squared (I2) statistic, were performed to assess the appropriateness of pooling the data. Main results Twenty‐three studies enrolling 2074 preterm infants in 18 countries were included in the review. All studies except one applied transfusion guidelines. The quality of the trials varied. Most trials were of small sample size. Only one study clearly stated that infants were excluded if they had received red blood cell transfusion prior to study entry (Arif 2005). A total of 16 studies, including 1825 infants reported on the primary outcome of "use of one or more red cell transfusions". The summary estimates were significant [typical RR; 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.86); typical RD; ‐0.13 (95% CI ‐0.17, ‐0.09); typical NNTB; 8 (95% CI 6, 11)]. There was statistically significant heterogeneity [for RR (p< 0.004), I2= 56.7%; for RD (p = 0.003), I2= 56.0%]. Similar results were obtained in secondary analyses based on different combinations of high doses of EPO and high and low iron supplementation. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions for low doses EPO in combination with high or low dose of iron. Two studies (n = 188) reported a significant reduction in the number of donors to whom the infant was exposed [typical WMD; ‐0.63 (95% CI ‐1.07, ‐0.19)]. A significant reduction in the total volume (ml/kg) of blood transfused per infant [typical WMD; ‐6 ml (95% CI ‐1, ‐11)] and in the number of transfusions per infant [typical WMD ‐0.27 (95% CI ‐0.12, ‐0.42 )] was noted. There was a significant increase in the risk of stage > 3 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the EPO group [typical RR; 1.71 (95% CI 1.15, 2.54); typical RD; 0.05 (95% CI 0.01, 0.09); NNTH; 20 (95% CI 11, 100)]. The non‐significant results for ROP (any stage reported) showed a similar trend. The increased risk for ROP may be associated with use of higher doses of supplemental of iron in the EPO group than in the control group. The rates for mortality, sepsis, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neutropenia, hypertension, length of hospital stay or long‐term neurodevelopmental outcomes were not significantly change by the administration of EPO. Authors' conclusions Early administration of EPO reduces the use one or more red blood cell transfusions, the volume of red blood cells transfused, and the number of donors and transfusions the infant is exposed to following study entry. The small reductions are of limited clinical importance. Any donor exposure is likely not avoided as most studies included infants, who had received red cell transfusions prior to trial entry. There was a significant increase in the rate of ROP (stage >3). Animal data and observational studies in humans support a possible association between treatment with EPO and the development of ROP. EPO does not significantly decrease or increase any of the other important neonatal adverse outcomes including mortality. The incidence of ROP should be ascertained in the studies that have already been conducted but did not report on this outcome. Any ongoing research should deal with the issue of ROP and evaluate the current clinical practice that will limit donor exposure through satellite units. Research efforts should focus on limiting donor exposure (to as few donors as possible) during the first few days of life in sick neonates, when red blood cell transfusions are most likely to be required and cannot be prevented by early (or late) EPO treatment. Due to the limited benefits and the increased risk of ROP, early administration of EPO is not recommended. Plain language summary In all newborn infants, the number of red blood cells in the circulation falls after birth. In infants born before term, this is exaggerated by frequent blood letting, which is necessary to monitor the infant's clinical condition. Therefore, infants born before term are likely to require transfusions of red blood cells. Low levels of erythropoietin (EPO) (a substance in the blood that stimulates red blood cell production) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anemia. EPO can be given "early" (before the infant reaches eight days of age) in order to prevent the use of red blood cell transfusions. More than 2000 infants born before term have been enrolled in 23 studies that used this approach. EPO reduces the risk of receiving red blood transfusion and donor exposure following initiation of EPO treatment. However, the overall benefit of EPO may not be clinically important, as many of these infants had been exposed to red blood cell transfusions prior to entry into the trials. Treatment with early EPO did not have any important effects on mortality or common complications of preterm birth, except that EPO increased the risk for retinopathy of prematurity, a serious complication that may cause blindness in babies born before term. Based on our findings, EPO is not recommended for routine use in preterm infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.006
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review JournalSame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207