MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247980767 · doi:10.21009/jpud.132.09

Teacher Knowledge in Early Childhood Gender Education

2019· article· en· W4247980767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roudlotul Islamiyah, Suparno Suparno

Bibliographic record

VenueJPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
KeywordsEarly childhood educationPsychologyEarly childhoodTeacher educationPerceptionValue (mathematics)PedagogyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The industrial development era 4.0, many threats lurk children in the form of bad influence through books, videos, or other media and become a challenge for parents and teachers. Gender education and the introduction of personal identity are important given early on. This study aims to determine the effect of teacher knowledge on the implementation of gender education in early childhood. This research uses quantitative survey research methods with a simple linear regression design for data analysis. The respondents were 34 early childhood education teachers. The results show the data with the conclusion that the calculated value> t table and p-value (sig) of 0.001 (<0.05) which means that there is a significant influence on teacher knowledge about early childhood gender education. Research suggests about how to improve gender education in early childhood education and create learning modules for early childhood teacher guidance. Keywords: Early gender education, Teacher knowledge about gender education References: Adoniou, M. (2015). Teacher knowledge: a complex tapestry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.932330 Awaji M, A. K. (2016). Analysis of workrelated injuries among health care workers in armed forces hospi-tal southern region, kingdom of saudi arabia. Br J Med Med Res., 15(4). Azwar, S. (2010). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Chapman, R. (2016). A case study of gendered play in preschools: how early childhood educators’ perceptions of gender influence children’s play. Early Child Development and Care, 186(8), 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1089435 Cherney, I. D., & Dempsey, J. (2010). Young children’s classification, stereotyping and play behaviour for gender neutral and ambiguous toys. Educational Psychology, 30(6), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.498416 Filipović, K. (2018). Gender Representation in Children’s Books: Case of an Early Childhood Setting. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1464086 Francis, B. (2010). Gender, toys and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054981003732278 Frödén, S. (2019). Situated decoding of gender in a Swedish preschool practice. Ethnography and Education, 14(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1422135 Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Mulivariante dengan Program IBM SPSS 19 Edisi 5. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Huggins, V. (2014). Education 3-13 : International Journal of Primary , Elementary and Early Years Education Children at play : Learning gender in the early years. gray2011.p(November). https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2011.644316 La Paro, K. M., Van Schagen, A., King, E., & Lippard, C. (2018). A Systems Perspective on Practicum Experiences in Early Childhood Teacher Education: Focus on Interprofessional Relationships. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0872-8 Lynch, M. (2015). Guys and dolls: a qualitative study of teachers’ views of gendered play in kindergarten. Early Child Development and Care, 185(5), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.950260 Meland, A. T., & Kaltvedt, E. H. (2019). Tracking gender in kindergarten. Early Child Development and Care, 189(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1302945 Muasya, J., & Kazungu, T. (2018). ‘The unfinished business’: Exploring teachers’ views on gender and pedagogical practices in public preschools in Nairobi county, Kenya. African Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.61.18.007 Notoatmodjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Nursalam. (2014). Manajemen Keperawatan: Aplikasi Dalam Praktik Keperawatan Profesional. Jakarta: Salemba Medika. Papalia, D. E., & Duskin, R. (2015). Perkembangan Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika. Salawati, L., Herry, N., & Putra, A. (2014). Analisis Tindakan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Perawat Dalam Pengendalian Infeksi Nosokomial Di Ruang ICU RSUD DR. Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh. 14(3). Solehudin, M. (2018). Peran Guru Pai Dalam Mengembangkan Kecerdasan Emosional (EQ) Dan Kecer-dasan Spiritual (SQ) Siswa Smk Komputama Majenang. Jurnal Tawadhu, 1(3). Sulastri, S., & Ahmad Tarmizi, A. T. (2017). Peran Orang Tua Dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Raudhatul Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.19109/ra.v1i1.1526 Suyadi. (2014). Teori pembelajaran anak usia dini, dalam kajian neourons. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Vanner, C. (2019). Examining gender safety in schools: Teacher agency and resistance in two primary schools in kirinyaga, kenya. Education Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010063 Warin, J., & Adriany, V. (2017). Gender flexible pedagogy in early childhood education. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1105738 Wingrave, M. (2018). Perceptions of gender in early years. Gender and Education, 30(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1258457 Wu, Y. P., Wu, J. F., Chen, Y. M., Han, L., Han, P. G., Wang, P., & Gao, F. (2015). Shyness and School Adjustment Among Chinese Preschool Children: Examining the Moderating Effect of Gender and Teacher–Child Relationship. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.970503 Zhukovskyi, V., & Kostiuk, O. (2015). Stages Of Gender Education In Canadian Secondary Schools. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 5(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/rpp-2015-0037

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia DiniSame topicChild Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207