MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247981495 · doi:10.1109/59.962402

Bibliography on the application of probability methods in power system reliability evaluation 1996-1999

2001· article· en· W4247981495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringElectric power systemActivity-based costingComputer scienceBibliographyPower (physics)EngineeringLibrary scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a bibliography of papers on the subject of power system reliability evaluation. Papers in such areas as: probabilistic load flow, probabilistic production costing, probabilistic transient stability evaluation etc. have not been included except where they specifically address power system reliability evaluation. It includes material which has been made available since the publication of six previous papers "Bibliography on the Application of Probability Methods in Power System Reliability Evaluation", IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-91, p.649-660, 1972, Pas-97, p.2235-2242, 1978, PAS-103, p 275-282, 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol.3, no.4, p.1555-1564, 1988, vol.9, no.1, p.41-49, 1994, and vol.14, no.1, p.51-57, 1999.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it