MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248002105 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13751

Biometric Quality and its Impact on Template Ageing in a Longitudinal Fingerprint Study

2019· dissertation· en· W4248002105 on OpenAlexafffund
Henry Harvey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiometricsFingerprint (computing)Computer scienceQuality (philosophy)ResamplingArtificial intelligenceStatisticsData miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biometrics are increasingly deployed in domains ranging from social media authentication right up to border control. An important operational requirement for biometric systems is the supposed uniqueness and permanence of biometric records: physiological changes occurring between enrolment and verication are referred to as template ageing, and increase the likelihood of a misidentication. Its magnitude is hard to estimate, and the factors aecting it are relatively little studied. This work proposes a measure of template ageing, called biometric permanence, and develops a methodology to estimate it in the presence of confounding factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207