MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Alliterative<i><scp>M</scp>orte<scp>A</scp>rthure</i>

2017· other· en· W4248034750 on OpenAlexaff
K. S. Whetter, Thomas Crofts

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeLiteratureClassicsHistoryPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The alliterativeMorte Arthureis justly famous for two reasons. One is the quality of its narrative. The second is the importance of the unique manuscript in which it survives, Lincoln Cathedral, MS 91, copied by Robert Thornton and generally called the Lincoln Thornton manuscript to differentiate it from its counterpart, the London Thornton manuscript. In addition to its own considerable merits the alliterativeMortefollows the Galfridian Brut tradition, is a major source for Thomas Malory, and arguably offers an heroic account of Gawayne, Arthur, and the downfall of Arthurian England.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1850.067

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in BritainSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207