Faculty Opinions recommendation of Budesonide induces remission more effectively than prednisone in a controlled trial of patients with autoimmune hepatitis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease associated with cirrhosis and liver failure. Corticosteroid therapy induces long-term remission but has many side effects. We compared the effects of budesonide (a steroid that is rapidly metabolized, with low systemic exposure) and prednisone, both in combination with azathioprine.METHODS: We performed a 6-month, prospective, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, phase IIb trial of patients with AIH without evidence of cirrhosis who were given budesonide (3 mg, three times daily or twice daily) or prednisone (40 mg/d, tapered to 10 mg/d); patients also received azathioprine (1-2 mg/kg/d). Treatment was followed by a 6-month, open-label phase during which all patients received budesonide in addition to azathioprine. The primary end point was complete biochemical remission, defined as normal serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, without predefined steroid-specific side effects, at 6 months.RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 47/100 patients given budesonide (47.0%) and in 19/103 patients given prednisone (18.4%) (P < .001; 97.5% 1-side confidence interval [CI] = 16.2). At 6 months, complete biochemical remission occurred in 60% of the patients given budesonide versus 38.8% of those given prednisone (P = .001; CI: 7.7); 72.0% of those in the budesonide group did not develop steroid-specific side effects versus 46.6% in the prednisone group (P < .001; CI = 12.3). Among 87 patients who were initially given prednisone and then received budesonide after 6 months, steroid-specific side effects decreased from 44.8% to 26.4% at month 12 (P < .002).CONCLUSIONS: Oral budesonide, in combination with azathioprine, induces and maintains remission in patients with noncirrhotic AIH, with a low rate of steroid-specific side effects.Copyright © 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. PMID: 20600032
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".