MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248071932 · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10204

Parallel Olap on Multi/Many-Core and Cloud Platforms

2014· dissertation· en· W4248071932 on OpenAlexaff
Hamidreza Zaboli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOnline analytical processingComputer scienceData cubeCloud computingParallel computingMulti-core processorCube (algebra)Distributed computingData warehouseDatabaseData miningOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most powerful and prominent technologies for knowledge discovery in Decision Support System environments is Online Analytical Processing (OLAP). OLAP is the foundation for a wide range of essential business applications. Since its introduction, OLAP has consistently required a massive computational power. On the other hand, the physical limits of the speed for single processor systems bound the performance of any single processor solution. Parallel and distributed processing can provide two key ingredients to solve this problem: increased computational power through parallel processors and increased I/O bandwidth through parallel storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207