Proper Choice Of Urban Canopy Model For Climate Simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) is coupled with the three types of Urban Canopy Models (UCMs) to predict heat and moisture fluxes from the canopy to the atmosphere. The three UCMs are slab, single-layer, and multi-layer. The WRF-UCMs are applied to investigate the impacts of summer heat on urban climate and characterize the heat island intensity in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) during the 2011 heat wave period (17th-21st July). The WRF-UCMs are evaluated using simulated hourly air temperature and wind speed results with measurements obtained from various weather stations across the domain of interest. The multi-layer of the urban canopy model (ML-UCM) predicts air temperature and wind speed more accurately comparing to other UCMs. The ML-UCM accounts for the turbulence and multi-reflection within the urban canopy and increases the computation time 30-40% compared to other canopy models (single and slab model).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it