Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper confronts the unspoken/unwritten patriarchal and settler colonial roots of Ghadar and its history through Toni Morrison’s ([1987] 2008) method of using imagination to construct re-memories of the truths that dominant histories erase. To do this, this paper draws on feminist critiques of the state, the private/public divide, the individual/citizen, and manhood/masculinities (Bederman [1995] 2006; Kaplan [2002] 2006; Pateman [1983] 2006; Pettman [1996] 2006) and thereby genders Radha D’Souza’s discussion of the colonial/imperial disconnecting of people from places (2014, 63). Focussing on the Punjabi context, this paper takes up Ghadarites’ employment of the private/public divide, their manipulation of patriarchal power, their appropriation of women’s bodies/voices, and their participation in “logic[s] of genocide” (Smith 2011, 51) as means of claiming access to citizen/political rights. Ultimately, it is argued that Ghadar was a movement for access to manhood power, whiteness and settler coloniality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".