MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248109655 · doi:10.1002/ange.201803760

Photochemical Generation of Chiral N,B,X‐Heterocycles by Heteroaromatic C−X Bond Scission (X=S, O) and Boron Insertion

2018· article· en· W4248109655 on OpenAlexafffund
Soren K. Mellerup, Cally Li, Julian Radtke, Xiang Wang, Quan‐Song Li, Suning Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryBond cleavageConrotatory and disrotatoryReactivity (psychology)BoronPhotochemistryAcetylideMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryRing (chemistry)Organic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chiral organoboron compounds with a chelate backbone and mesityl/heterocycle substituents (thienyl, furyl, and derivatives thereof) undergo a quantitative phototransformation that yields rare, chiral N,B,X‐containing heterocycles, such as base‐stabilized 1,2‐thiaborinines and 1,2‐oxaborinines. Boriranes were observed as intermediates in some of these transformations. The oxaborinines display further reactivity, generating 4a,12b‐dihydrobenzo[h][1,2]oxaborinino[4,3‐f]quinolines through a sequential conrotatory electrocyclization and a [1,5]‐H shift. The N,B,X‐containing heterocycles display strong blue‐green to orange‐red emission in the solid state. Combined DFT//CASP2T calculations suggest that a common biradical intermediate is responsible for the formation of these compounds as well as their interconversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistryFrench-language works237,207