Jacques Grasset de Saint-Sauveur et les costumes des «Sauvages du Canada»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s'intéresse à l'œuvre de Jacques Grasset de Saint-Sauveur (1757–1810), particulièrement à sa production graphique et plus spécifiquement à sa représentation des Iroquois du Canada. L'analyse d'un vaste corpus de textes et de gravures a permis de retracer les sources littéraires et iconographiques de la représentation de la femme et de l'homme Iroquois de Grasset de Saint-Sauveur et d'en dégager l'originalité. Alors que l'on s'interroge sur les notions de vérité ou de fiction, on est ici confronté à un artiste qui copie, imite, reproduit, juxtapose et entremêle des éléments empreints de la réalité, d'une certaine réalité. La gravure devient ainsi le véhicule parfait pour partager des connaissances anciennes et propager des idées nouvelles dans l'Europe des Lumières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".