Synthesis and Characterization of (Co,Ni)O Solid Solutions As Protective Coatings for Inert Anodes in Aluminum Electrolysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The industrial production of primary aluminum from alumina ore (Al 2 O 3 ) is still carried out by the Hall-Héroult process. The process relies on dissolving alumina in an electrolyte consisting mainly of liquid Na 3 AlF 6 at 950-1000 °C. While the reduction of dissolved Al 3+ ions in aluminum occurs at the cathode, the complementary reaction occurs at a carbon anode that is consumed to form carbon dioxide, which necessitates its regular replacement (every 25 days). The overall reaction is the following: Canadian aluminum smelters produce annually about 6 Mt of CO 2 eq (reported in 2017), which is equivalent to the CO 2 amount generated annually by about 2 million cars. The substitution of consumable carbon anodes with inert (O 2 -evolving) anodes in the electrochemical cells to produce aluminium would have significant environmental benefits because it would eliminate the emissions of carbon dioxide and perfluorocarbons associated with the consumption of the carbon anode. However, the design of inert anodes is a major challenge because of the severe Al electrolysis conditions (cryolithic medium at 960 °C), which requires materials with excellent resistance to corrosion and thermal shock as well as adequate electrochemical properties [1]. Single phase Cu 65 Ni 20 Fe 15 alloy is a promising inert anode for Al production due to its ability to form a protective NiFe 2 O 4 layer upon Al electrolysis. However, its corrosion resistance is still insufficient and a protective layer is required to prevent the penetration of electrolyte into the nickel ferrite layer and the formation of fluorides during Al electrolysis [2-4]. In this context, the use of (Co,Ni)O-based protective coatings for metallic anode appears promising [5]. However, it is challenging to prepare a single phase, coherent and crack-free oxide layer as required for industrial Al production. A potentially relevant method to produce (Co,Ni)O coated inert anodes is by direct deposition of (Co,Ni)O oxide compounds by spray deposition techniques such as suspension plasma spray (SPS) and high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF). These additive manufacturing deposition are well-established technologies for producing protective oxide coatings for various industrial applications ( e.g. gas turbines). As a first step toward this goal, pure Co x Ni 1−x O solid solutions have been prepared over the whole composition range by a two-step procedure that consisted of high-energy ball milling followed by a heat treatment of Co 3 O 4 and NiO powders [6]. Then, the thermal stability and electrical conductivity of (Co,Ni)O solid solutions were determined at temperatures ranging between 700 and 1000 °C. Also, their dissolution rate was measured in K-based cryolite at 700 °C and in Na-based cryolite at 1000 °C. In a second step, (Co,Ni)O powders have been used as raw materials for the thermal spraying (HVOF and SPS) of protective coatings onto Cu-Ni-Fe inert anodes [7]. The morphological and microstructural characteristics of the coating depending on the thermal spray conditions will be presented. The oxidation behaviour of the coated inert anodes under air and argon is presented. Preliminary investigation of the electrochemical behaviour under Al electrolysis conditions of the (Co,Ni)O/Cu-Ni-Fe anodes will be also presented and discussed. References [1] I. Galasiu et al., Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf (2007). [2]S. Jucken et al., Corr. Sci. (2019) 147: 321-329. [3]E. Gavrilova et al., Corr. Sci. (2015) 101: 105-113. [4] S. Helle et al., Corr. Sci. (2010) 52:3348-3353. [5] T. Nguyen et al., Light Metals (2006) 385-390. [6] S. Mohammadkhani et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (2019) 102: 5063– 5070. [7] S. Mohammadkhani et al., Surf. Coat. Tech. (2020) 399: 126168.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".