MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248153410 · doi:10.7752/jpes.2020.s3292

[no title]

2020· paratext· W4248153410 on OpenAlex
Paul Eliason, Carly McKay, Willem Meeuwisse, Brent Hagel, Luc Nadeau, Carolyn A. Emery

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Education and Sport · 2020
Typeparatext
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesInternational Olympic CommitteeAlberta Children's Hospital FoundationChildren's Hospital Foundation
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concussions can lead to cognitive or neuromotor impairments which may influence skill performance. Few studies have investigated concussion and sports-specific skill performance, particularly in youth. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine previous concussion and components of the Hockey Canada Skills Test, a measure of ice hockey-specific skill performance, in youth ice hockey players (ages 11-17). A secondary purpose was todetermine the test-retest reliability of these components. Players completed a detailed baseline questionnaire on previous concussion history. On-ice measures included forward agility weave, forward/backward speed skate, transition agility, and a 6-repeat endurance skate (all measured in seconds). Multiple linear regression was conducted to examine history of concussion, number of previous concussions, time since most recent concussion, and severity of most recent concussion on on-ice performance. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences with Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement. In total, 596 participants [525 males and 71 females, representing elite (upper 30% by division of play) and non-elite (lower 70%)] were recruited to examine the primary purpose. History of concussion (yes/no) and time since most recent concussion was not associated with any component. Players reporting 2 or more concussions were significantly faster than those with no previous concussion on forward agility weave with the puck. For every additional day to return to play post-concussion, player times were significantly faster on forward agility weave with and without the puck, transition agility without the puck, and backward speed with and without the puck. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.50 to 0.92 and the Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement varied by component. These findings indicate players with and without history of concussion have similar on-ice scores, and that the components of the Hockey Canada Skills Test are a reliable measure of on-ice performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Education and SportFrench-language works237,207