MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248159820 · doi:10.1017/s1092852900027905

CNS Volume 15 supplement 7 Cover and Front matter

2010· article· en· W4248159820 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCNS Spectrums · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San DiegoSchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityHealth Resources and Services AdministrationUniversity of CincinnatiEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaYale UniversityRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnMassachusetts General HospitalGlaxoSmithKlineNational Institute of Mental HealthPfizerUniversity of Washington
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Front (military)Volume (thermodynamics)Content (measure theory)Action (physics)Computer sciencePhysicsEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the availability of a large number of antidepressants, treatment nonresponse in major depressive disorder (MDD) persists.As highlighted by findings from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, the first few months of treatment may be the most critical for treatment success.When the first antidepressant is not effective, a common dilemma is whether to use an adjunctive treatment or to switch medications completely.A substantial proportion of patients with MDD do not achieve remission from sequential courses of treatment with currently available strategies.Many who do improve are left with significant residual symptoms.Adjunctive treatments in MDD have the capacity to reduce relapse rates during the process of switching medication, provide neurotransmitter effects, or cause intended therapeutic side effects.However, they can also cause pharmacokinetic interactions, additive side effects, regimen complexity, and poorer compliance.Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have a much larger evidence base than other adjunctive strategies for MDD, although they are associated with extrapyramidal side effects.While antidepressant monotherapy is the standard first-line treatment, psychotherapy still represents an important treatment pathway.Cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and several more basic forms of behavior therapy have been shown to have antidepressant efficacy comparable to antidepressant medication.In this Expert Review Supplement, Michael E. Thase, MD, provides an overview of unmet needs in the management of MDD.Highlighting findings from STAR*D, Dr. Thase discusses expected first-line treatment outcomes, augmentation/switch strategies, and the role of psychotherapy.Next, Michael Gitlin, MD, provides an overview of several first-line adjunctive treatments, focusing on lithium, triiodothyronine, and stimulants.Finally, J. Craig Nelson, MD, reviews the role of adjunctive SGAs in treatment-resistant depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6050.392

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCNS SpectrumsSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207