Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face aux discours post-11 septembre sur la nécessité de la "guerre au terrorisme", développer des approches critiques contre cette voie à sens unique où le champ de la sécurité se trouve réduit à sa dimension militaire classique, s'impose comme une urgence. Ce numéro propose d'ouvrir des perspectives telles que celles de l'environnement et du genre. Un numéro dirigé par une équipe canadienne et basé sur d'intenses échanges transatlantiques. Given the post-September 11th discourse on the necessity of the “war against terrorism’, it is urgent that critical approaches are developed to combat this one-way street, in which security is reduced to only its military dimensions. This new issue of the journal Cultures & Conflits proposes to open up other perspectives, such as those of the environment or of gender. In positioning the issue within the field of theories of international relations, the authors of this issue move the focus onto the research currently being carried out, with varying and/or new perspectives. They feed debates beyond existing and imposed boundaries. Produced by a team led by Professor Macleod from the University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), and the result of intense transatlantic exchanges, this issue also wishes to make a contribution to theoretical debates about the role, normative claims, place, and pertinence of classical internationalist approaches, through the use of constructive criticism and a neo-gramscian approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it