MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248220194 · doi:10.4095/292282

Geology, Mahony Lake (southeast), Northwest Territories

2013· report· en· W4248220194 on OpenAlexaffabout
K M Fallas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyPaleontologyGeomorphologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The southeast quadrant of the Mahony Lake map area (NTS 96-F) straddles the boundary between the Great Bear Plain and the Franklin Mountains, Northwest Territories. The mountain range extending north-northwest from Mount St. Charles (informally known as the St. Charles range), overlooks an area dominated by a low, undulating, forested plain with very sparse bedrock exposure. The west-flowing Great Bear River dissects both the Great Bear Plain and the St. Charles range. The plain is underlain by flat-lying to gently folded Cretaceous sedimentary strata. Folded and faulted Paleozoic carbonate strata are exposed at surface along the St. Charles range. The steep reverse faults truncating anticlinal folds are associated with Cordilleran deformation at the eastern edge of the Franklin Mountains. Cretaceous strata are preserved unconformably above Devonian strata on either side of the St. Charles range. Historical exploration by petroleum companies in the area targeted potential reservoirs in buried Cambrian strata. Public-domain seismic-reflection profiles archived with the National Energy Board were used to help constrain the distribution of map units and structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207