2018 Canadian Spine Society Abstracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Spine Society is a collaborative organization of spine surgeons advancing excellence in research, education and patient care.Accreditation: This event is an Accredited Group Learning Activity (Section 1) as defined by the Maintenance of Certification Program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, approved by The Canadian Orthopaedic Association.Course Objectives: The Annual Scientific Conference of the Canadian Spine Society offers a comprehensive review of spine therapy and spine surgery in Canada.The meeting is held in conjunction with the Canadian Paediatric Spine Society and offers current perspectives on the management of both adult and pediatric spinal problems.The program covers both surgical and nonoperative answers to a wide range of spinal pathologies and addresses the more general issues of pain and pain management.It provides practical instruction for the treatment of specific common clinical challenges but also reports on advances in basic spine research and contemporary philosophies on the patient-centered approach.The conference includes the yearly review of work by the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) and will include both papers arising from the research and an operational meeting for all those interested in participating in its ongoing collaboration.The continuing medical educationapproved format will again feature a well-balanced mix of didactic instructional lectures, interactive symposia, hands-on product demonstrations and professional interaction.This Annual Scientific Conference is the most important spine meeting in Canada and a must for anyone involved in administering or administrating spine care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.626 | 0.420 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".