MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248311689 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.13225199.v1

Site-Specific Electronic Properties of [Ag25(SR)18]- Nanoclusters by X-Ray Spectroscopy

2020· preprint· en· W4248311689 on OpenAlexafffund
Ziyi Chen, Andrew Walsh, xiao wei, Manzhou Zhu, Peng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyXANESNanoclustersElectronic structureValence (chemistry)Density functional theorySpectroscopyMaterials scienceChemistryX-ray absorption spectroscopyAbsorption spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsComputational chemistryNanotechnologyNuclear magnetic resonancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the site-specific electronic properties of Ag 25 (SR) 18 and Au 25 (SR) 18 using X-ray spectroscopy experiments and quantum simulations. To overcome the final state effect observed in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), a unique method was developed to reliably analyze the charge transfer behavior of the NCs. Density functional theory calculations were combined with XPS to provide more insight into the electronic properties of the NCs. The differences in the XPS valence bands of these two NCs were further compared and interpreted using the relativistic effect. The first derivative of the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectrum was further used as a tool to sensitively probe the bonding properties of Ag 25 (SR) 18 . By combining the experimental XANES data and their site-specific quantum simulations, the large impact of the staple motif on the bonding properties of the NC was demonstrated. These findings highlight the unique electronic properties of each atomic site in Ag 25 (SR) 18 ; the effective X-ray analysis techniques developed here can offer new opportunities for the site-specific study of other NCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicNanocluster Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207