MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase 2, single agent study of CI-1033 administered at two doses in ovarian cancer patients who failed platinum therapy

2004· article· en· W4248315589 on OpenAlexaff
S. M. Campos, Michael V. Seiden, Amar Oza, M. Plante, Ronald K. Potkul, Oday Hamid, P Lenehan, Eric Kaldjian, Cheryl Jordan, Hal W. Hirte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectron Spin Resonance Studies
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOvarian cancerCancerOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5054 Background: Ovarian cancer that is refractory to platinum-based therapies is a therapeutic challenge, particularly in the setting of erbB-1 and -2 receptor over- expression. CI-1033 is an irreversible, 4-anilinoquinazoline pan-erbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in a wide variety of human tumor xenografts, particularly erbB+ tumors including ovarian SK-OV-3. Methods: This study evaluated 50- and 200mg doses of CI-1033, given daily for 21 days repeated every 28 until disease progression in pts with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Primary eligibility criteria included disease progression following platinum therapy, measurable disease, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 60–100. Baseline tumor erbB receptor profiles were determined by IHC staining retrospectively in 56 of the 105 pts. Endpoints included 1-yr progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between January and May of 2002, 105 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups: overall median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 4 (1–12); median KPS was 90. Fifty-three pts received 146 cycles in the 50-mg arm; 52 pts received 138 cycles in the 200-mg arm. Dose reductions were necessary in 59% of pts in the 200-mg arm predominantly due to gastrointestinal adverse effects (AEs); no pts required dose reductions in the 50-mg arm. The most common treatment-related AEs in the 50-mg arm were Grade 1–2 diarrhea (57%), asthenia (43%), and nausea (41%); AEs in the 200-mg arm were Grade 2–3 diarrhea (85%), stomatitis (69%), and rash (58%). There were no objective responders in either arm; stable disease (≥8 weeks) was achieved in 28% and 34% of pts in the 50- and 200-mg arms, respectively. One-yr PFS rates were 0% and 9%, and 1-year OS were 37% and 38% for 50- and 200-mg dose group, respectively. No associations were apparent between baseline tumor erbB expression profiles and PFS or OS. Conclusions: CI-1033 has minimal activity in this heavily pretreated, platinum-refractory population. The 50-mg dosing regimen was better tolerated than the 200-mg arm, with gastrointestinal AEs being most common toxicities. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Employed by Pfizer Eli-Lilly Pfizer Eli Lilly; GlaxoSmithKline

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicElectron Spin Resonance StudiesFrench-language works237,207