MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4248317296 · doi:10.22587/jasr.2019.15.2.3

Effect of Cryptocurrency Trade on Select Real Currency and Commodity Trading

2019· article· en· W4248317296 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aarushi Dalmia, Kim Yb, Kim Jg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Sciences Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptocurrencyCurrencyCommodityMonetary economicsEconomicsCommerceBusinessComputer scienceFinanceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptocurrency marked its presence with the inception of bitcoin in the year 2009.Bitcoin was created as a medium for peer to peer exchange.Cryptocurrency can be defined as money in digital form which can be used for exchange of goods and services.The cryptocurrency was designed to discover a type of currency which is not government regulated or in simpler terms currency whose demand and supply cannot be regulated by authorities.Cryptocurrency use cryptography to generate and allocate currency.The process of cryptography requires different verification of transactions without involving any king of centralized authority.To verify that no currency unit is spent twice, transaction verification authenticates the amount of transaction as well as the ownership of the currency.This step by step process is known as mining.The transaction record of cryptocurrency is stored in a ledger called blockchain.Blockchain can be defined as a distributed ledger which forms the basis for cryptocurrency market but its implication is not restricted to only cryptocurrency, blockchain technology can be used in financial services, supply chain management, government documentation.Mining algorithms in most of the cryptocurrency are public.Cryptocurrency presence was not felt only because of its concept but the controversies associated with it like the money laundering and terrorism activities being funded through its mechanism.The cryptocurrency market has shown turbulent with significant growth as well as downfalls.Since the main purpose of cryptocurrency was to replace real currency the question arises whether it has been able to impact the value of real currency in any significant way or not.This research aims at studying the correlation between cryptocurrencies namely Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Neo, Ripple, Ethereum, Tron, Litecoin, Dash, Monero, IOTA and real currencies namely Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Euro, Pound sterling, Japanese yen, Chinese yuan and commodities namely gold, silver keeping united states dollar as base for all conversions. REVIEW OF LITERATURECryptocurrency is a relatively new concept in the financial market.Although a few researchers and practitioners have researched the area but there is still much research that can be conducted in this field in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Sciences Research→Same topicMarket Dynamics and Volatility→French-language works237,207→