MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>M</scp> aracle, <scp>L</scp> ee

2010· other· en· W4248329848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cheryl Suzack

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Twentieth-Century Fiction · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPoliticsOralityStorytellingColonialismSovereigntySociologyDecolonizationHistoryValue (mathematics)AestheticsGender studiesAnthropologyLiteratureNarrativeArtPolitical scienceLawLiteracy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lee Maracle burst onto the Canadian literary scene with her autobiographical novel Bobbi Lee, Indian Rebel (1975), and she continues to be an important political and literary voice. Her work transcends geographical and historical boundaries to express the plight of Indigenous women and children, the histories of colonialism and struggles for decolonization by Indigenous communities, and the spiritual and aesthetic sensibilities of her Salish ancestry. Maracle's writing is often polemical, using character development and plot to engage directly with her reader's assumptions about Indigenous peoples’ experiences of racism and colonialism, yet her work is also enlivened by the core tenets of orality and transformation that inhere in Indigenous storytelling traditions. Through the integration of political, aesthetic, and spiritual elements, her writing expresses the force and value of literary sovereignty by demonstrating how an Indigenous worldview integrates self, family, community, and culture to decolonizing ends. Her writing is importantly situated alongside that of a generation of Canadian authors, including Jeannette Armstrong, Beth Brant, Maria Campbell, and Beatrice Culleton Mosionier, who have refashioned Indigenous writing in order to formalize and define their activist aesthetics and politics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Twentieth-Century FictionSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207