Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous avons d’abord clos notre étude des lieux de culte et communautés religieuses dans le Levant central par ses zones septentrionales (de la Haute Galilée à l’Anti‑Liban en passant par le mont Hermon). Leurs sanctuaires peri/ extra‑urbains et villageois attestent de traditions culturelles diverses et de pratiques et formes d’organisation religieuses qui renvoient à des référents culturels mêlés et posent des questions de traductibilité. Le deuxième semestre a été consacré à un bilan des changements et interactions religieux dans le monde romain oriental étudiés pendant une vingtaine d’années. Quatre thèmes, entrelacés, ont été choisis pour leur capacité à cristalliser à la fois les conditions de ces changements et leurs manifestations en termes religieux – entre l’impact religieux de l’arrivée de l’imperium romain dans les cités et des dynamiques rituelles et théologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".