Coal Consumption Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) in China and Australia: Evidence From ARDL Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, coal consumption (CS) for EKC is analyzed for two countries which are China and Australia by ARDL model (Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model). China and Australia are among the countries which are heavily dependent on coal for energy demands. China is the current leader in the world for coal consumption. In this study, we aim to analyze the effect of economic growth on CS for China and Australia. The importance of the study is that it is the first study for time series studies in the literature of single country studies that analyze CS EKC. Analysis of CS EKC is important since the world is still heavily depended on coal for energy demands. CS EKC is verified for Australia between GDP (gross domestic product per capita), CS and square of GDP (GP) for the period between 1980 and 2016. CS EKC is verified for China between GDP, CS, GP and energy consumption (ENEC) for the period between 1980 and 2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it