MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4248464425 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11442

Community Resilience, Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaption: Learning with Coastal Communities in Central Vietnam

2016· dissertation· en· W4248464425 on OpenAlexaff
Huu Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersKementerian Sumber Asli dan Alam Sekitar
KeywordsDisaster risk reductionCommunity resilienceEnvironmental planningPsychological resilienceAccountabilityClimate changeEnvironmental resource managementParticipatory action researchCorporate governancePolitical scienceSocial capitalResilience (materials science)GeographyLocal communityClimate resilienceBusinessEconomic growthEngineeringEcologyPsychologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vietnam has made significant efforts through disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) programs to enhance the resilience of its coastal communities and reduce climate risks.These programs have contributed to significant declines in weather-related human fatalities, but the increases in human injuries and economic losses over the last two decades reveals that these programs have not been fully successful.This research explores and evaluates factors shaping the success of the recent DRR and CCA efforts in central Vietnam's coastal communities and investigates opportunities to enhance community resilience (CR) and thereby reduce risks of future climate change.The empirical part of this research relied on community-based participatory action research approaches to engage local residents in Tuong Van community and their representatives from local to provincial agencies.Findings from the case study showed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDisaster Management and Resilience→French-language works237,207→