A Tale of Two Tactics: Laclos's Novel Approach to Military Crisis and Reform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scholars have long recognized Les Liaisons Dangereuses as a document for social reform, declaring the need for more women's education and exposing moral corruption among French nobles. Scholars have also recognized Laclos's military background and his metaphoric language of war and alliances. This essay places Laclos's novel in the context of French military reform in the late eighteenth century and, in doing so, reveals new layers of social critique. As an artillery officer and critic of Vauban, he was deeply affected by this thirty-year period of debate among officers on how to improve the French army after the loss of the Seven Years' War. With this context in mind, the military language of Valmont and Merteuil, when interpreted literally, reveal Laclos's take on the reform period. Merteuil's methods of seduction bear an uncanny resemblance to the tactics of Frederick the Great, and Valmont's conquest of la présidente de Tourvel echoes Vaubanian siege-craft. With this perspective, the “war” between the two leads not to an odd ending without resolution, but the expected conclusion for these military debates and reforms. In Les Liaisons Dangereuses, Laclos reveals his perception of the military debates of the time and argues that any meaningful military reform requires societal changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".