MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4248480364 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10500026.4

Last century warming over the Canadian Atlantic shelves linked to weak Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

2018· preprint· en· W4248480364 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benoît Thibodeau, Christelle Not, Jiang Zhu, Andreas Schmittner, David Noone, Clay Tabor, Jiaxu Zhang, Zhengyu Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywordsδ18OOceanographyClimatologyForaminiferaGeologyClimate changeHoloceneShutdown of thermohaline circulationNorth Atlantic Deep WaterBenthic zoneThermohaline circulationStable isotope ratioPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is a key component of the global climate system. Many models predict a weakening or even a collapse of the AMOC under future climate change. Recent studies suggested a 20th century weakening of the AMOC of unprecedented amplitude ( 15%) over the last millennium. Here, we present δ18O of benthic foraminifera in a sediment core from the Laurentian Channel and demonstrate that the δ18O trend is linked to the strength of the AMOC. In this 100-year record, the AMOC signal decrease steadily to reach its minimum value in the late 1970’s. The weakest AMOC signal is constant until 2000. We present a longer δ18O record of 1,500 years and highlight the uniqueness of these high δ18O values over that period. Moreover, the long record is also characterized by statistically heavier δ18O during the Little Ice age suggesting a relatively weak AMOC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→