Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude examine le parcours emprunté par dix-neuf directeurs des ressources humaines (DRH) et quatre chercheurs ayant choisi la recherche-action pour accompagner le transfert, le partage et la co-construction de connaissances propices au déploiement du Lean Santé au Québec. Propulsée par le ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, cette démarche donne lieu à des ateliers interactifs sur plusieurs thématiques décidées au fur et à mesure selon les besoins anticipés des DRH. Ils ont pu trouver des solutions pragmatiques entre pairs ainsi qu’avec d’autres acteurs qui se sont joints en cours de route. La recherche-action montre que le déploiement du Lean Santé au Québec ne peut se réaliser sans une contextualisation locale du changement. Le mode agile permet justement d’adapter les stratégies de mise en œuvre à l’environnement sans cesse turbulent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it