MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of polymerized‐type I collagen in knee osteoarthritis. II. <i>In vivo</i> study

2009· article· en· W4248503848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janette Furuzawa‐Carballeda, O. A. Muñoz‐Chablé, Salvador Israel Macías‐Hernández, Andres Agualimpia-Janning

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisVisual analogue scaleWOMACPlaceboInternal medicineStatistical significanceSurgeryGastroenterologyUrologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Polymerized-Type I Collagen (Polymerized-Collagen) is an anti-inflammatory and a tissue regenerator biodrug. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of Polymerized-Collagen in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS AND DESIGN: Patients (n=53) were treated with 12 intra-articular injections of 2 mL of Polymerized-Collagen (n=27) or 2 mL of placebo (n=26) during 6 months. Follow up period was 6 months. The primary endpoints included Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Lequesne index, and pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were patient global score, investigator global score and drug evaluation. Clinical improvement was determined if the decrease in pain exceeds 20 mm on a VAS and patients achieved at least 20% of improvement from baseline. Urinary levels of C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of collagen type II (CTXII) and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were determined by enzyme immunoassays. Statistical analysis was performed by intention to treat. RESULTS: Polymerized-Collagen was safe and well tolerated. Patients had a statistically significant improvement (P<0.05) from baseline vs. Polymerized-Collagen and vs. placebo at 6 months in: Lequesne Index (13.1+/-0.5 vs. 7.1+/-0.7 vs. 9.6+/-0.8; P=0.027), WOMAC (9.0+/-0.5 vs. 4.0+/-0.6 vs. 5.80+/-0.8; P=0.032), patient VAS (60.0+/-2.6 vs. 20.6+/-2.4 vs. 36.1+/-4.5; P=0.003), physician VAS (49.8+/-1.9 vs. 16.8+/-2.9 vs. 29.8+/-2.9; P=0.002), patient global score (1.08+/-0.1 vs. 2.7+/-0.1 vs. 1.9+/-0.2; P=0.028) and analgesic usage (30.1+/-9.4 vs. 11.0+/-3.4 vs. 17.9+/-4.9; P=0.001). This improvement was persistent during the follow up. A threefold increase in CTXII was determined in placebo group. No differences were found on hs CRP and incidence of adverse events between groups. CONCLUSION: Polymerized-Collagen is safe and effective in the treatment of knee OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Clinical InvestigationSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207