<i>De Ptolémée à la Guillotière (XVe–XVIe siècle): Des cartes pour la France pourquoi, comment?</i> By Monique Pelletier. <i>City and Cosmos: The Medieval World in Urban Form</i>. By Keith D. Lilley. <i>The Maps of Matthew Paris: Medieval Journeys through Space, Time and Liturgy</i>. By Daniel K. Connolly. <i>Cartografía Medieval: El Enigma del Mapamundi de 1375</i>. By Álvaro Fernández García. <i>La carta de Gabriel de Vallseca de 1439: Estudi i edicio. By Ramon J. Pujades i Bataller</i>. <i>King Henry's Map of the British Isles: BL Cotton MS Augustus I i 9</i>. Commentary by Peter Barber. <i>Covens & Mortier: A Map Publishing House in Amsterdam 1685–1866</i>. By Marco van Egmond. <i>El geógrafo Juan López (1765–1825) y el comercio de mapas en España</i>. By Agustín Hernando. <i>The Atlas of Scotland Containing Maps of Each County</i>. By John Thomson. <i>Geographia antiqua: rivista di geografia storica del mondo antico e di storia della geografia</i>. <i>The Fourth Part of the World: The Race to the Ends of the Earth and the Epic Story of the Map that Gave America Its Name</i>. By Toby Lester. <i>Painter in a Savage Land: The Strange Saga of the First European Artist in North America</i>. By Miles Harvey. <i>Cartographic Encounters: Indigenous Peoples and the Exploration of the New World</i>. By John Rennie Short. <i>Mapping New Jersey: An Evolving Landscape</i>. By Maxine N. Lurie and Peter O. Wacker. <i>Eastern Astrolabes</i>. By David Pingree. <i>Census of Portolan Charts and Atlases, as Reported and Listed by the Noted Scholars of the Genre in Their Works Ranging from 1897 to 2008</i>. By Richard Pflederer. <i>The Map as Art: Contemporary Artists Explore Cartography</i>. By Katharine Harmon, with essays by Gayle Clemans. <i>Formatting Europe: Mapping a Continent</i>. Guest editors W. Bracke, J. L. Renteux, and W. Bodenstein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".