Living off the grid: How to survive ice storms and other natural disasters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The authors of this paper live and run a business from a solar-powered home in rural Ontario, Canada. They welcome comments or questions, but for personal reasons, have requested that their names be withheld. If any reader wishes to contact them, please send a note to the Managing Editor (address on page 1). Most North Americans will never live “off the grid,” but this short article inspires all of us “on the grid” to pay attention to our energy consumption. Just by turning off the lights, everybody can help maintain a healthy ecosphere. And we could begin, one by one, establishing our own rooftop power system to replace or supplement grid-based power. Global warming from greenhouse gases, partly due to coal and other fossil-fuel powered electric power generation, is already shrinking vast areas of the sea-ice ecosytem in the Arctic and bleaching or killing large areas of coral reefs in the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic Oceans. In short, the impacts of global warming on biodiversity has emerged from theory to the real world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".