MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248522163 · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000980

Avelumab Alone or in Combination With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Platinum-Resistant or Platinum-Refractory Ovarian Cancer (JAVELIN Ovarian 200): An Open-Label, Three-Arm, Randomised, Phase 3 Study

2021· article· en· W4248522163 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Pujade-Lauraine, Keiichi Fujiwara, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Amit M. Oza, Rebecca Kristeleit, I. Ray-Coquard, Gary Richardson, Cristiana Sessa, Kan Yonemori, Susana Banerjee, Alexandra Léary, Anna V. Tinker, Kyung Hae Jung, Radosław Mądry, Sang‐Yoon Park, Charles Anderson, Fabian Zohren, Ross Stewart, Caimiao Wei, Samuel S. Dychter, Bradley J. Monk

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSpinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOvarian cancerChemotherapyRefractory (planetary science)OncologyInternal medicineAvelumabCarboplatinCancerCisplatinImmunotherapyPembrolizumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Abstracted from Lancet Oncol 2021;22:1034–1046) The majority of patients with ovarian cancer will experience relapse and develop platinum-resistant disease after being treated with frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment options for platinum-resistance or platinum-refractory disease are very limited, usually involving nonplatinum chemotherapy, and they are associated with poor objective response rates and life expectancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207