Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Arctic and Antarctic regions are characterized by sparse populations living in small, isolated settlements which tend to have crowded households. Although there are regional differences, living conditions and disease patterns for these populations are relatively comparable. Scientific studies on infectious diseases in Arctic regions inhabited by indigenous people are most often performed on high-incident diseases. A number of infectious diseases such as invasive disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, tuberculosis, chronic otitis media, hepatitis B virus, sexually transmitted infections, Helicobacter pylori, parasitic infections, and bacterial zoonoses occur at higher rates in Arctic regions than in their southern counterparts. This chapter describes infections with known high prevalence in the Arctic regions of Alaska, Canada, Greenland, and Siberia. The infectious disease patterns for persons living in and traveling to Svalbard and the Antarctic reflect those of their corresponding populations (e.g. Norway for Svalbard and countries of origin for persons traveling to the Antarctic).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it