MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248539564 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2006.1716619

Shape Morphing and Reconstruction Using A Self-Organizing Feature Map

2006· article· en· W4248539564 on OpenAlex
P.C. Igwe, A.P. Sangole, G.K. Knopf

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Computer visionFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shape reconstruction process has remained an active research area in archaeology, paleontology, forensics, cultural heritage restoration and art conservation. In all these cases, the reconstruction process is tedious and time consuming. Aside from collecting several randomly mixed fragments, the fragments also have to be glued together. A stable and efficient algorithm for computer aided reconstruction of fragmented models is introduced in this paper. This novel approach is based on the morphing technique using the deformable self organizing feature map (SOFM). The SOFM is a skeletal framework for modeling surfaces that dynamically change shape. The lattice of the SOFM is a spherical map that maintains the relative connectivity of the neighboring nodes as it transforms under external and internal forces. The digitized fragments are assigned weight vectors and morphed into the weight vectors of the original model. The technique is illustrated by reconstructing the geometry of a complete vase from the surface data acquired from several fragmented pieces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it