MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248546571 · doi:10.1145/1514095

Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction

2009· paratext· en· W4248546571 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)RobotHuman–robot interactionComputer scienceMultidisciplinary approachRelevance (law)PleasureTheme (computing)Artificial intelligenceLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2009). HRI is a single-track, highly selective annual conference that showcases the very best research and thinking in human-robot interaction. HRI is inherently interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary, reflecting work from researchers in social psychology, cognitive science, HCI, human factors, artificial intelligence, robotics, organizational behavior, anthropology, and many more. The theme of HRI 2009, "Interacting Naturally With Robots" reflects the importance of robots meeting the complex demands of the environments and contexts in which they operate. In particular, natural human-like communications are becoming critical for robots operating in everyday settings such as the home, office, schools, shopping malls, and other public and private spaces. This year's conference places special emphasis on robots interacting naturally with people. The call for papers attracted 120 full paper and 62 late-breaking abstract submissions from Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Canada, and the United States. The program committee led by the program co-chairs conducted a very rigorous review process for full papers this year, accepting 23 full papers for oral presentation and publication in the proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Furthermore, 59 late-breaking abstracts were screened for relevance to the HRI conference, and are presented as posters, exposing a broader perspective of solutions and challenges in HRI. They will be made available in the ACM Digital Library as non-archival abstracts. Finally, a total of 13 videos (out of 19 submissions) were accepted based on importance, novelty and entertainment value and will be shown in a special video session. The accepted presentations cover a variety of topics, including human-robot communication, robot perception and prediction, interface design, and methods for studying human-robot interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Automated SystemsFrench-language works237,207