MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248613052 · doi:10.24124/2001/bpgub192

Lone, lorn creatures: the matrix of trauma, memory and identity in Dickens' orphan heroes

2001· dissertation· en· W4248613052 on OpenAlexaff
Shannon Coleen Whissell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Policy, and Dickens Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)LiteratureContext (archaeology)HistoryPsychoanalysisSociologyAestheticsPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While orphan protagonists have long been a trope in western literature, Charles Dickens expands this tradition by using his orphan characters as both fictional creations and socially relevant representations.Literary theorists Baruch Hochman and llja Wachs posit that the "orphan condition" is a nearly universal sense of loss of self and abandonment which can result from a variety of childhood traumas.Thus, while the characters under study are bereft of parents, and are thus literal orphans, their stories speak to a broader readership through the reader's psychic identification with the orphan.Trauma theory explicates the process of bearing testimony, an act by which the survivor of trauma can redeem a sense of self by sharing the story with an auditor.David Copperfield and Great Expectations, when situated at the matrix of trauma, identity, and language formed by trauma theory, can reveal the sometimes limited efficacy of fiction as a form of testimony.The plethora of orphan texts published in the nineteenth century warrant particular explanation.Thus, it is necessary to investigate the changes to the conception of childhood in the early-to mid-Victorian period as well as to understand the generalized anxiety of the middle class in this period of great change.The legal, social, economic and existential context for the Victorian orphan reveals powerful factors which combined to make the working class mid-Victorian orphan both a spurce of fear in society and a source for sympathetic representation in literature.David Copperfield is the most obviously autobiographical of Dickens' novels, yet judged as testimony, it is a failure.This failure stems from two separate causes: first, Dickens strips Copperfield of the rage and fear inherent in the orphan condition and instead lll focuses his energies in the culturally normative values of diligence and earnest striving, and second, the Jack of emotional reporting in David Copperfield makes the novel a story of plot and character rather than a testimony which focuses on the self.Although Great Expectations is a far briefer and less autobiographical novel than David Copperfield, Pip's fuller investigation of his orphan state and the repercussions of that trauma allows this tex t to acquire the status of testimony.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.024
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Policy, and Dickens StudiesFrench-language works237,207