Bibliographic record
Abstract
Die diskursanalytische Arbeit untersucht die handelspolitischen Interessen der Provinz Quebec während der CETA-Verhandlung zwischen Kanada und der EU (2006-2014). Die Verhandlung der Vertragskapitel „Öffentliche Vergabe“, „Ausländische Direktinvestition“ und „Landwirtschaft“ aus der Perspektive Quebecs macht deutlich, dass die Regierung aus bestehenden Ideenrepertoires schöpfte, um Quebecs Interessen in einem komplexen transatlantischen Gefüge zu entwickeln und geschickt voranzutreiben. Den Bezugsrahmen, um aktuelle und historische Vorgänge zu interpretieren und Allianzen zur Durchsetzung der eigenen Position zu schmieden, stellten dabei insbesondere der kanadische Föderalismus sowie wirtschaftspolitische und kulturelle Entwicklungsdiskurse dar. Die Untersuchung basiert auf der systematischen quantitativen Analyse von Quebecer Parlamentsdebatten sowie der qualitativen Auswertung strukturierter Interviews mit Regierungsmitgliedern, Verwaltungsbeamten, Wirtschaftsverbänden und NGOs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.238 | 0.068 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".