MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248641268 · doi:10.1002/pmic.201190110

In this issue

2011· article· en· W4248641268 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePROTEOMICS · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyWnt signaling pathwayCell biologyNeural stem cellProgenitor cellStem cellComputational biologySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A cell of two minds Stem cells have two principal tasks: (i) being prepared to replicate vegetatively on command, and (ii) being prepared to replicate differentially on command. It is always helpful if there is a way of recognizing the small pools of cells with these capabilities, preferably biomarkers that can be recognized quickly, cleanly and sensitively. One source that has not been thoroughly explored is very small peptides, MW <5 kDa. Maltman et al. report here on an enhanced protocol that has some interesting properties when used with neural progenitor cells. The procedure does not require a label, and uses LC‐MALDI‐TOF/TOF for analysis. It identified 12 different proteins on the basis of differentiated abundance, including nestin, vimentin, and GFAP, which are associated with neural development, some up‐regulated, some down‐regulated. pp. 3992–4006 Re‐virginized mouse mammary glands You might think the mouse mammary gland system was designed by Richard Branson but we cannot give Sir Richard credit for this one. The mouse system, unlike the human mammary gland can, in large part, be recycled. During pregnancy, the luminal cells are directed to re‐differentiate into the milk‐producing aveoli (MaSC) until the end of lactation. The MaSC niche also directs neural cell reprogramming. Ji et al. purified fractions from cultured mammary tissue, adherent plasma membrane and sub‐fractions. Comparative proteomic analysis revealed a number of molecules and signaling pathways were involved, such as Wnt and Eph/ephrin signaling, and integrin‐mediated interactions. The analysis hinted at a number of solutions, but none answers all the issues all the time. pp. 4029–4039 The mystery in the can kicked down the road If you were a small boy who lived in a small US town in the 1950s, an image from the recent US congressional hearings resonated. You, too, kicked a can all the way home. You also wore blue jeans with pre‐patched knees and had to wait until Saturday for the next episode of “Sergeant Preston of the Yukon” at the only movie theater in town. You shared your bedroom with your younger brother, so the mess was always his. Moving to the future now with SAHA (a potent blocker of histone deacetylase inhibitor) and HDAC (a histone deacetylase), they too, exhibit can‐can interactions if examined closely, so Fischer et al. created a small, three‐pronged binding molecule that could selectively identify a non‐canonical SAHA binder. The most interesting target found was isochorismatase (ISOC2), which has been implicated in regulation of tumor suppressor p16(INK4A). Interesting soup in that can... pp. 4096–4104

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROTEOMICSSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207