MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248668354 · doi:10.14430/arctic67962

Journal News

2019· article· fr· W4248668354 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M. S. Murray, Patricia Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueARCTIC · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This year we entered a new phase in the life of the Arctic Institute of North America.Included among the many new and exciting research and education initiatives is a transition to low-carbon operations.We have already begun this transition process at the Kluane Lake Research Station with the installation of solar power for lights and electric charging in the living quarters, and we continue to explore ways to decrease our fossil fuel consumption at that facility and to become increasingly self-sustaining in the offgrid environment.Here in Calgary, we are also taking an important step toward netzero operations.Beginning in 2020, we will produce the journal Arctic as an online publication only, with the December 2019 issue the last in print.As an organization that understands the impacts of global change, and one which is particularly concerned with the rapid environmental changes witnessed in the Arctic regions, we feel a strong obligation to develop strategies for reducing our own impacts.In the case of the journal, online publication means a significant reduction in our consumption of paper, ink, and plastic, and a reduction in our transportation-related pollution.The high quality of the journal will not be affected by this change and, in fact, many subscribers already receive the online edition only.For those who still prefer a printed copy, we will offer a print-on-demand option.We know that Institute members and subscribers support our efforts to be a responsible steward of our environment, and we are confident that you will continue to enjoy and use the journal for decades to come.After 72 years of continuous publication, Arctic remains the leading source for accessing outstanding, multidisciplinary academic research on the polar and subpolar regions.With the Institute's 75th anniversary year approaching (November 2019-December 2020), we are proud to engage in efforts to build a stronger future for the Arctic environment, and continue to communicate research through our flagship journal.This issue marks changes to the journal's Editorial Advisory Board.Typically, membership on the Board is for a period of three years with a possible extension.Editorial advisors have always been important sources of guidance for the journal, promoting Arctic as a venue for publication among their colleagues, occasionally peer reviewing manuscript submissions in their area of expertise, suggesting suitable reviewers, and providing feedback in matters of editorial policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCTICSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207