Reply By Authors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Jan 2021Reply By Authorsis a reply to letterEditorial CommentEditorial Comment Benjamin Shiff, Rodney H. Breau, Premal Patel, Ranjeeta Mallick, Simon Tanguay, Alan So, Luke Lavallée, Ron Moore, Ricardo Rendon, Anil Kapoor, Frédéric Pouliot, Antonio Finelli, Bimal Bhindi, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Naveen Basappa, Lori Wood, Daniel Heng, Georg Bjarnason, and Darrel Drachenberg Benjamin ShiffBenjamin Shiff Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Equal study contribution. More articles by this author , Rodney H. BreauRodney H. Breau Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Equal study contribution. More articles by this author , Premal PatelPremal Patel Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada More articles by this author , Ranjeeta MallickRanjeeta Mallick Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Simon TanguaySimon Tanguay Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author , Alan SoAlan So Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada More articles by this author , Luke LavalléeLuke Lavallée Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Ron MooreRon Moore Division of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author , Ricardo RendonRicardo Rendon Department of Urology), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada More articles by this author , Anil KapoorAnil Kapoor Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Frédéric PouliotFrédéric Pouliot Division of Urology, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author , Antonio FinelliAntonio Finelli Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , Bimal BhindiBimal Bhindi Section of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author , Jean-Baptiste LattoufJean-Baptiste Lattouf Section of Urology, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author , Naveen BasappaNaveen Basappa Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author , Lori WoodLori Wood Division of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada More articles by this author , Daniel HengDaniel Heng Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author , Georg BjarnasonGeorg Bjarnason Department of Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author , and Darrel DrachenbergDarrel Drachenberg †Correspondence: St. Boniface Hospital, Z3015-409 Tache Ave., Winnipeg, Manitoba , CanadaR2H 2A6 telephone: 204-237-2571; E-mail Address: [email protected] Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001230.03AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Reply By Authors." The Journal of Urology, 205(1), pp. 84–85 Reference 1. : Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 12: 231. Google Scholar © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology10 Nov 2020Editorial CommentJournal of Urology10 Nov 2020Editorial Comment Volume 205Issue 1January 2021Page: 84-85 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Benjamin Shiff Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Rodney H. Breau Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Equal study contribution. More articles by this author Premal Patel Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada More articles by this author Ranjeeta Mallick Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Simon Tanguay Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author Alan So Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada More articles by this author Luke Lavallée Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Ron Moore Division of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author Ricardo Rendon Department of Urology), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada More articles by this author Anil Kapoor Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Frédéric Pouliot Division of Urology, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author Antonio Finelli Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Bimal Bhindi Section of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author Jean-Baptiste Lattouf Section of Urology, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada More articles by this author Naveen Basappa Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author Lori Wood Division of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada More articles by this author Daniel Heng Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada More articles by this author Georg Bjarnason Department of Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada More articles by this author Darrel Drachenberg Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada †Correspondence: St. Boniface Hospital, Z3015-409 Tache Ave., Winnipeg, Manitoba , CanadaR2H 2A6 telephone: 204-237-2571; E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.070 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.094 | 0.077 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".