Abstract 098: Foxp3+ T Regulatory Lymphocytes Counteract Angiotensin Ii-induced Vascular Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: T effector lymphocytes contribute to vascular injury in angiotensin (Ang) II-induced hypertension, but the role of T regulatory lymphocytes (Tregs) is unclear. Ang II-induced hypertension is blunted in T and B lymphocyte-deficient (Rag1-/-) mice, and restored with reconstitution of T cells. We hypothesized that adoptive transfer of FOXP3-deficient Scurfy (Sf) vs. wild-type (WT) T cells will exacerbate Ang II-induced vascular damage in Rag1-/- mice. Methods: Eleven-week old male Rag1-/- mice were injected IV with vehicle, 10 million WT or Sf T cells, 1 million CD4+CD25+ Tregs alone or with Sf T cells, and 2 weeks later were infused or not with Ang II (490 ng/kg/min, SC) for 14 days (n=3-8). Telemetric BP, vascular function and structure, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and fibronectin expression in mesenteric arteries (MA) were determined. Results: Ang II induced a 40 mmHg systolic BP rise in all the groups, but diastolic BP rise was ~10 mmHg greater in WT and Sf T cell-injected mice than in controls (P<0.01). Treg injection alone or with Sf T cells prevented or delayed by 7 days the BP rise, respectively (P<0.05). Ang II did not induce endothelial dysfunction in vehicle or Treg only-injected mice. Adoptive transfer of WT T cells restored Ang II induced-endothelial dysfunction (60±5% vs. 83±4%, P<0.05), which was exaggerated in Sf T cell-injected mice (56±6% vs. 97±7%, P<0.01), but reduced by Treg co-injection (74±4%, P<0.05). Ang II increased ROS production in MA wall (239±32% vs. 119±20%) and perivascular fat (369±39% vs. 84±8%) in Sf T cell-injected mice (P<0.01), but not when co-injected with Tregs. Ang II induced increased vascular stiffness (P<0.01) and media/lumen (M/L, P<0.05) in vehicle (strain at 140 mmHg: 0.60±0.02 vs. 0.80±0.02; M/L: 4.1±0.2 vs. 2.9±0.2%) and Sf T cell-injected mice (strain at 140 mmHg: 0.63±0.01 vs. 0.89±0.04; M/L: 4.7±0.3 vs. 2.9±0.1%). Ang II increased MA fibronectin expression (P<0.01) in vehicle (113±12 vs. 51±14 RFU/μm2) and Sf T cell-injected mice (85±7 vs. 36±9 RFU/μm2). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that Foxp3+ Tregs have a protective role against Ang II-induced vascular dysfunction, remodeling and oxidative stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".