MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248733990 · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr47.c6

Soil Temperature

2005· book-chapter· en· W4248733990 on OpenAlex
Michael D. Novak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy monograph/Agronomy · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAridEnvironmental scienceLimitingDrainageSoil waterTemperate climateSoil scienceWater contentHydrology (agriculture)IrrigationGeologyGeotechnical engineeringAgronomyEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most basic quantities describing the physical state of the soil is its temperature. This chapter describes the basic features of soil temperature variations with depth and time as observed in nature. It discusses theories that have been developed to explain and predict soil temperature regimes. The chapter also describes the critical aspects associated with measuring soil temperature. G. D. Buchan suggests that the study of soil temperature has been neglected by soil physicists and agronomists compared with water because water is often a limiting factor to crop growth, either being in deficit in semi-arid and arid areas or in excess in many temperate regions, and is subject to better control, either through irrigation or drainage. Buchan has written an excellent comprehensive overview covering both theory and measurement, with emphasis on influences of moisture flow on heat transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it