MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248741358 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-01/28/1401

Investigation of Heterogeneous Catalysts by an Electrochemical Method: Ceria and Titania-Supported Iridium Nanoparticles for Ethylene Oxidation

2016· article· en· W4248741358 on OpenAlexaff
Yasmine M. Hajar, Holly A. E. Dole, Martin Couillard, Elena A. Baranova

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisElectrolyteMaterials scienceChemical engineeringElectrochemistryFast ion conductorIonic bondingInorganic chemistryElectrodeChemistryOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemical promotion of catalysis (EPOC) is a well-established phenomenon in heterogeneous catalysis for enhancing catalytic activity through the application of a small electrical stimulus between the catalyst-working and counter electrode deposited on a solid electrolyte (e.g., yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ)) 1 . This electrical stimulus causes the backspillover of ionic species, in this case O 2- , from the solid electrolyte to the catalyst surface. A resulting change in catalytic activity is due to the modification of the electronic properties of the catalyst. The extent to which these properties can be modified depends on several factors, such as temperature, type of catalyst material and solid electrolyte, catalyst morphology, e.g., particle size and dispersion, ionic conductivity, and gas phase composition 2,3 . EPOC is an interfacial phenomenon where two-phase boundaries, i.e., catalyst/gas and catalyst/solid electrolyte, as well as the three-phase boundary (tpb), i.e., electrolyte/catalyst/gas phase play a key role in the reaction. Recent EPOC studies have shown catalytic enhancement of highly dispersed, nano-structured catalysts through the use of mixed ionic electronic conducting (MIEC) materials, i.e., CeO 2 4 and TiO 2 5 , which are in contact with the YSZ solid-electrolyte. This approach allows for considerable reduction of the mass of metal catalyst required, while maintaining the electrical conductivity of the working electrode needed to complete the electrochemical cell 6,7 . Both CeO 2 and TiO 2 are considered reducible supports. More specifically, CeO 2 , due to its non-stoichiometry, has the ability to undergo conversion between Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ quite easily 7 . TiO 2 has also been known to strongly influence the performance of the supported metal catalysts due to this reducibility 8 . These properties make the use of ceria- and titania-containing catalysts of interest for many catalytic applications. This study investigates the complete oxidation of ethylene over low particle size (1.1 nm) ruthenium and (1.0 nm) iridium nanoparticles supported on CeO 2 and TiO 2 under open (o.c.) and closed circuit conditions. Furthermore, detailed electrochemical characterization of the Ir- and Ru- based catalysts was carried out using a steady-state polarization technique. The results obtained were correlated with their o.c. catalytic performance. The discussion of this study includes the effect of temperature and applied potential on the catalytic activity of the supported and freestanding Ir and Ru catalysts. Ru and Ir nanoparticles, synthesized using a polyol reduction method, were supported on CeO 2 and TiO 2 resulting in a 1 wt% catalyst loading (RuNPs/CeO 2 , IrNPs/CeO 2 , RuNPs/TiO 2 and IrNPs/TiO 2 ). The supported and free-standing nanoparticle catalysts were deposited on one side of a YSZ solid electrolyte disk in order to apply polarization 4 . Gold counter and reference electrodes were applied on the opposite side of YSZ disk 9 . Figure 1 shows representative polarization curves of the Ir/CeO 2 catalyst at various temperatures. Positive current density (i) is due to electrochemical oxidation of ethylene and oxygen evolution at the tpb, whereas anodic current density is due to O 2 electro-reduction. As can be seen, the rate of both positive and negative current densities (i) increases with temperature, indicating an increase in the reaction rates at the tpb as a result of an increase in electrolyte conductivity. i was also found to increase from 1.26, 3.5 to 29.5 µA.cm -2 for 350, 375 and 400 o C, respectively. As a result, this indicates that as temperature is increased, there is more available O 2- at the tpb. A combination of open circuit catalytic and electrochemical measurements was used to evaluate and understand the catalytic performance of highly-dispersed Ru- and Ir-based, free-standing, and CeO 2 and TiO 2 -supported catalysts with regards to the effect of O 2- ions from the support. The presence of CeO 2 and TiO 2 was shown to play a significant role in enhancing the catalytic activity of Ru and Ir nanoparticles. Acknowledgment The financial support from Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) is acknowledged. References 1. B. S. Vayenas Costas G., Bebelis Symeon, Pliangos Costas, Electrochemical Activation of Catalysis , (2001). 2. S. Brosda, J. Catal. , 208 , 38–53 (2002). 3. P. Vernoux et al., Chem. Rev. , 113 , 8192–8260 (2013). 4. H. A. E. Dole, A. C. G. S. A. Costa, M. Couillard, and E. A. Baranova, J. Catal. , 333 , 40–50 (2016) 5. E. I. Papaioannou et al., J. Appl. Electrochem. , 40 , 1859–1865 (2010). 6. Kambolis et al., ECS Trans. , 45 , 535–541 (2012). 7. H. A. E. Dole, L. F. Safady, S. Ntais, M. Couillard, and E. A. Baranova, J. Catal. , 318 , 85–94 (2014). 8. S. J. Tauster, Acc. Chem. Res. , 20 , 389–394 (1987). 9. H. A. E. Dole, L. F. Safady, S. Ntais, M. Couillard, and E. A. Baranova, ECS Trans. , 61 , 65–74 (2014). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCatalysis and Oxidation ReactionsFrench-language works237,207