MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248802303 · doi:10.1149/ma2011-01/16/1142

Pr<sub>3</sub>Si<sub>6</sub>N<sub>11</sub>/Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> Stacked High-k Gate Dielectrics with High Quality Ultrathin Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> Interfacial Layers

2011· article· en· W4248802303 on OpenAlexaff
Akinobu Teramoto, Tadahiro Ohmi

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDielectricHigh-κ dielectricOptoelectronicsQuality (philosophy)Gate dielectricElectrical engineeringTransistorPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract not Available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207