MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248819489 · doi:10.1002/cjs

A generalized class of skew distributions and associated robust quantile regression models

2014· article· en· W4248819489 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nuttanan Wichitaksorn, S. T. Boris Choy, Richard Gerlach

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsStatisticsQuantileSkewnessSkewApplied mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a generalized class of univariate skew distributions that are constructed through partitioning two scaled mixture of normal (Gaussian) distributions. The proposed distributions have a skewness parameter defined in the interval (0,1), allowing direct application to parametric quantile regression. Employing scale mixture of normals facilitates efficient estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Two simulation studies, one on estimation with skew error regression models, the other on parametric quantile regression models reveal favourable estimation properties. Two corresponding empirical studies, one analysing U.S. market returns, the other on infant birthweight data further illustrate the proposed distributions and their estimation. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 42: 579–596; 2014 © 2014 Statistical Society of Canada Les auteurs présentent une classe généralisée de lois univariées asymétriques construites à partir du partitionnement de deux mélanges normalisés de lois normales (gaussiennes). Les lois proposées possèdent un paramètre d'asymétrie défini dans l'intervalle (0,1), permettant une application directe à la régression quantile paramétrique. L'utilisation de mélanges normalisés de lois normales permet une estimation efficace au moyen d'algorithmes de Monte-Carlo à chaî nes de Markov. Deux études de simulation portant sur la régression à erreur asymétrique et la régression quantile paramétrique révèlent des propriétés favorables pour l'estimation. Les auteurs illustrent les lois proposées et leur estimation pour ces deux types de modèles à l'aide d’études empiriques, une première portant sur l'analyse des rendements du marché des États-Unis, et une seconde à propos de données sur le poids de bébés à la naissance. La revue canadienne de statistique xx: 1–18; 2014 © 2014 Société statistique du Canada Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207