MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248841489 · doi:10.1002/ange.201507092

Delineating the Role of Helical Intermediates in Natively Unfolded Polypeptide Amyloid Assembly and Cytotoxicity

2015· article· en· W4248841489 on OpenAlexafffund
Carole Anne De Carufel, Noé Quittot, Phuong Nguyen, Steve Bourgault

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsPROTEOUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryAmyloid (mycology)CytotoxicityProtein foldingBiophysicsBiochemistryLipid bilayerMembraneIn vitroBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Amyloid deposition is a hallmark of many diseases, such as the Alzheimer’s disease. Numerous amyloidogenic proteins, including the islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) associated with type II diabetes, are natively unfolded and need to undergo conformational rearrangements allowing the formation of locally ordered structure(s) to initiate self‐assembly. Recent studies have indicated that the formation of α‐helical intermediates accelerates fibrillization, suggesting that these species are on‐pathway to amyloid assembly. By identifying an IAPP derivative with a restricted conformational ensemble that co‐assembles with IAPP, we observed that helical species were off‐pathway in homogenous environment and in presence of lipid bilayers or glycosaminoglycans. Moreover, preventing helical folding potentiated membrane perturbation and IAPP cytotoxicity, indicating that stabilization of helical motif(s) is a promising strategy to prevent cell degeneration associated with amyloidogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207