MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248858577 · doi:10.1090/bull/1492

Heilbronn characters

2015· article· en· W4248858577 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard Foote, Hy Ginsberg, V. Kumar Murty

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the American Mathematical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of VermontHarvard University
KeywordsConjectureScope (computer science)Character (mathematics)WeavingSeries (stratigraphy)Pure mathematicsMathematicsComputer scienceAlgebra over a fieldPaleontologyGeometryBiologyZoologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a seminal paper in 1972 Hans Heilbronn introduced a virtual character associated to representations of Galois extensions of number fields and Artin’s Conjecture on the holomorphy of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper L"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">L</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -series. His construction has evolved in both application and scope, and may now be applied to produce what are called Heilbronn characters of arbitrary finite groups. This article surveys the inception and development of this concept, weaving together its number-theoretic and group-theoretic dimensions, and culminates in a description of the recent classification of unfaithful minimal Heilbronn characters. Connections with other areas of mathematics, variations on these themes, and possible future directions are also explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207